Warning: include(../indexLinks.php) [function.include]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home2/infreedo/public_html/globalizationAgenda/north_american_union_lies.php on line 37
Warning: include() [function.include]: Failed opening '../indexLinks.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php') in /home2/infreedo/public_html/globalizationAgenda/north_american_union_lies.php on line 37
Archive:
North American Union Lies
by Benjamin Farnsworth | 06/06/2007
A North American United Nations?
by Benjamin Farnsworth | 06/06/2007
In an effort to destroy our country as we know it, our so called leaders are no longer serving the citizens, but instead serving the globalists. They are joining North America into one super-union while destroying the sovereignty of each country.
Before you write this off as some half-baked conspiracy theory, maybe you should learn a bit about "The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America", the official name of the North American Union. You can see details of it at
spp.gov.
Another interesting thing you can see there is lies.
Imagine, our own government lying to us.
The Lies
On Congressman Ron Paul's website on the SPP, he says,
"Congressional oversight of what might be one of the most significant developments in recent history is non-existent".And yet on SPP.gov Myths vs. Facts, it says,
" Myth: The SPP is being undertaken without the knowledge of the U.S. Congress.Fact: U.S. agencies involved with SPP regularly update and consult with members of Congress on our efforts and plans.
So let's put this together:
A sitting congressman says congressional oversight is non-existant and the SPP says that they "regularly" consult congress. So should we believe the most honest congressman in office today with a flawless and perfectly consistant voting record, or the traitors seeking deals with foreign countries?
I trust the congressman who regularly stands up for liberty. The government is currently up to no-good. They are selling out our country. I mean that literally.
Superhighway
You can then look at http://www.spp.gov/prosperity_agenda/index.asp?dName=prosperity_agenda#improve_productivity and see that they indeed want the North American Superhighway.
Their words are:
Improve the safety and efficiency of North America's transportation system by expanding market access, facilitating multimodal corridors,Yes, multimodal corridors. The nice way of saying North American Expressway to connect our future country. Also, it's something that all three countries can chip-in their tax dollars (and pesos) for.
Police and Militaries Uniting
On http://www.spp.gov/security_agenda/index.asp?dName=security_agenda you'll find something that sounds earily like our country's military joining with Canada's and Mexico's, as well as our police forces joining together.
It says:
Develop and implement a comprehensive North American strategy for combating transnational threats to the United States, Canada, and Mexico, including terrorism, organized crime, illegal drugs, migrant and contraband smuggling and trafficking.
The next two bullet points go even further:
Talk about over-extending the government... should I remind you of how efficiently the US government handled the Katrina Hurricane natural disaster? And now we're expecting to take on Canada's and Mexico's natural disasters? What are we trying to do, go bankrupt? Oh wait, we already are.Enhance partnerships on intelligence related to North American security.
Develop and implement a common approach to critical infrastructure protection, and response to cross-border terrorist incidents and, as applicable, natural disasters.
The illegal aliens being made legal is not just an incidental controversy. It's a weave in the growing fabric of this giant government attempting to take over our lives. "They" know how to ruin our sovereignty one step at a time and they are doing it.
Ron Paul's Page on the SPP
A North American United Nations?
August 28, 2006
Globalists and one-world promoters never seem to tire of coming up with ways to undermine the sovereignty of the United States. The most recent attempt comes in the form of the misnamed "Security and Prosperity Partnership Of North America (SPP)." In reality, this new "partnership" will likely make us far less secure and certainly less prosperous.
According to the US government website dedicated to the project, the SPP is neither a treaty nor a formal agreement. Rather, it is a "dialogue" launched by the heads of state of Canada, Mexico, and the United States at a summit in Waco, Texas in March, 2005.
What is a "dialogue"? We don't know. What we do know, however, is that Congressional oversight of what might be one of the most significant developments in recent history is non-existent. Congress has had no role at all in a "dialogue" that many see as a plan for a North American union.
According to the SPP website, this "dialogue" will create new supra-national organizations to "coordinate" border security, health policy, economic and trade policy, and energy policy between the governments of Mexico, Canada, and the United States. As such, it is but an extension of NAFTA- and CAFTA-like agreements that have far less to do with the free movement of goods and services than they do with government coordination and management of international trade.
Critics of NAFTA and CAFTA warned at the time that the agreements were actually a move toward more government control over international trade and an eventual merging of North America into a border-free area. Proponents of these agreements dismissed this as preposterous and conspiratorial. Now we see that the criticisms appear to be justified.
Let's examine just a couple of the many troubling statements on the SPP's US government website:
"We affirm our commitment to strengthen regulatory cooperation...and to have our central regulatory agencies complete a trilateral regulatory cooperation framework by 2007"
Though the US administration insists that the SPP does not undermine US sovereignty, how else can one take statements like this? How can establishing a "trilateral regulatory cooperation" not undermine our national sovereignty?
The website also states SPP's goal to "[i]mprove the health of our indigenous people through targeted bilateral and/or trilateral activities, including in health promotion, health education, disease prevention, and research." Who can read this and not see massive foreign aid transferred from the US taxpayer to foreign governments and well-connected private companies?
Also alarming are SPP pledges to "work towards the identification and adoption of best practices relating to the registration of medicinal products." That sounds like the much-criticized Codex Alimentarius, which seeks to radically limit Americans' health freedom.
Even more troubling are reports that under this new "partnership," a massive highway is being planned to stretch from Canada into Mexico, through the state of Texas. This is likely to cost the US taxpayer untold billions of dollars, will require eminent domain takings on an almost unimaginable scale, and will make the US more vulnerable to those who seek to enter our country to do us harm.
This all adds up to not only more and bigger government, but to the establishment of an unelected mega-government. As the SPP website itself admits, "The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America represents a broad and ambitious agenda." I hope my colleagues in Congress and American citizens will join me in opposing any "broad and ambitious" effort to undermine the security and sovereignty of the United States.